Kingdom People

May 11, 2007

Conversations with a Catholic 1: Which Church?

Filed under: Christianity, Eastern Orthodoxy, Roman Catholicism — Trevin Wax @ 5:58 am

Over the past two weeks, I have been corresponding with a Roman Catholic via email. Brian has graciously allowed me to make our correspondence public, so I will begin posting on this blog our letters to each other. 

Trevin’s Letter

Hi Brian,

It was nice to meet you on Friday and to hear of your mission work to India.

[You asked about my view of the Eastern Orthodox Church.] I have definite opinions on the Orthodox Church, since I did work for 5 years in Romania, which is an Eastern Orthodox country. I have had good and not-so-good experiences with the Orthodox, but I have sought to understand the theology better by reading Orthodox authors and books laying out the differences between Orthodoxy and Protestantism.

I did an interview on my blog with an Eastern Orthodox convert from evangelicalism, and then an interview with a convert the other way. If you are interested, here are the links to those interviews, as well as my thoughts on them.

Theron’s Story: Why I Left Evangelicalism for Eastern Orthodoxy
John’s Story: Why I Left Eastern Orthodoxy for Evangelicalism
Sola Scriptura: The Dividing Line between the Orthodox and Evangelicals

God bless you Brian, and I look forward to hearing from you.

Brian’s Response

I read the articles and came away thinking “What a great discourse!” …And you preserved a sense of fairness and impartiality irrespective of your Baptist background (with minor exception addressed below).

On the whole, I have a few thoughts. First, don’t be quick to dismiss the patristics. There are many first and second century writings (some purely secular historical accounts and others penned by early Christians) that give a detailed accounting of what Christian life was all about. Some of these writings are from men who learned the faith at the knee of Apostles, for example Polycarp, who was a disciple of John. Reading these one sees that the early Church closely resembled the Orthodox church. It was deeply liturgical, hierarchical, and sacramental. These accounts will not reveal a church which in any way resembles Protestantism.

Most of the earnest Protestants I know espouse, “We want to go back to the church of the upper room,” and then they cobble together their vision of what this might have looked like, not realizing that we have solid account of exactly what this church looked like. I highly recommend a book called “Four Witnesses” which examines the life of four of the early church fathers.

Secondly, in Theron’s interview it appears you’ve confused justification by “faith” alone and justification by “grace” alone. Such confusion is common, but the Orthodox and Roman Catholic Churches (RCC) have always condemned as heretical any teaching that there is salvation aside from God’s grace alone. Theron recognizes this and shifts the discussion to salvation by “faith” alone, although I’ve never heard salvation couched in “medical terms” as you eluded too – familial terms, yes, but not medical. Too lengthy to address here, I’ll simply state that Orthodox and RCC teach that faith and works flow from God’s grace, and they are inseparable (like two sides of the same coin). Mysterious yes, but fully supported by scripture. (Perhaps in some later correspondence I’ll produce supporting scripture.) Our faith is a gift of God’s grace, as are our works, and faith alone is not sufficient for salvation, nor are works wrought by our own effort (pelagianism).

One criticism where I see some unfairness in the treatment of Theron’s interview was bringing up the priests who threatened to cut off fingers. This seemed like dirty pool. With the roles reversed, Theron I’m sure could easily produce unsavory activity by Baptist pastors or youth ministers if he so desired, yet doing so might seem unfair, and indeed would be.

Is sola scriptura is the dividing line as you say? In a sense, but ultimately the dividing line is a broader question of where one’s authority lies. Did Jesus form one Church? If so, I want to be a part of it and want to submit to it (Mt 18:17, 1 Tim 3:15). Where is that Church? Is there a lineage that can be traced, or is it invisible? What role does scriptures have within this church? Does holy scriptures belong to the Church, within her bosom, or has the Church sprung from scriptures? Might Mt 16 more aptly said, “Thou art Peter, and on later writings I will build my church”? All such questions are important fodder for finding truth.

Lastly, like others who responded to your blog, I feel sad about the Orthodox guy who left for Protestantism. Don’t get me wrong… I’m glad he’s on fire for Jesus. But, it reminds me of how the social and political forces negative impacted the RCC, and how similar forces in Geneva negatively affected Calvin’s efforts. Governments and monarchies, acting in the name of Christianity, will muddle things every time. It’s sad that it happens, and it’s sad that John couldn’t find the proper perspective which would enable him to see Jesus, both in the Eucharist and in general in the Orthodox church.

This conversation continues here.

16 Comments »

  1. Trevin,

    I came across your web site recently and have enjoyed reading your entries, especially the articles on Orthodoxy and Bellevue Baptist Church (I’m a former Memphian). As a Catholic, I look forward to peeking in at your dialogue with Brian. I hope I can join the conversation, at least via comments. Our internet at home is down at this time, so I’m using my computer at work (AFTER I’ve clocked out!), but I can’t receive e-mails here.

    In any case, let me second Brian’s recommendation of Rod Bennett’s book “Four Witnesses”. It presents a readable and fascinating introduction to the life of the very early Church through the eyes of four of the greatest and most heroic pre-Nicean Fathers.

    Another excellant resource on the Fathers is William Jurgens three volume series “Faith of the Early Fathers”. Jurgens presents excerpts, in mostly chronological order, of the writings of the Fathers. The books also include a concordance, if that’s the correct word, identifying quotes from the Fathers that offer support for the doctrines and practices of Christian faith, ie: the Trinity, the Incarnation, the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist, infant baptism, purgatory, etc…

    Pax et bonum,
    Bob Hunt
    Knoxville, TN

    Comment by Bob Hunt — May 13, 2007 @ 6:45 am

  2. Hi Bob,

    Welcome! I hope the conversations with Brian will be helpful. I will definitely take a look at the four witness book that Brian mentions.

    I hope you enjoy the conversation and will continue to visit the blog.

    Comment by trevinwax — May 13, 2007 @ 2:35 pm

  3. Trevin, what a good idea to publish these letters and let us see the dialog. My protestant upbringing gave me the impression that “the Catholics” where almost the enemy, and it is only now, many years later, that I begin to realise just how much common ground we share. Good work.

    Comment by jonfeatherstone — May 13, 2007 @ 3:36 pm

  4. Hi Jon,

    Thanks for the feedback. We’ve actually sent quite a few emails to each other. I’ll be posting more correspondence every few days or so. I hope they prove to be beneficial.

    Comment by trevinwax — May 13, 2007 @ 8:30 pm

  5. Thanks for sharing. Good reading, and well timed, especially as we hear of Beckwith’s move to Rome.

    Comment by Michael — May 14, 2007 @ 5:17 pm

  6. Thanks, Michael.

    I was a little surprised at Beckwith’s conversion, but not totally. I believe we may see more high-profile conversions to Rome in the future. Still, evangelicals that convert generally leave some of their evangelical convictions (about the importance of personal faith and relationship of Jesus) largely intact, which in itself is changing the dynamic of the RCC in America.

    Comment by trevinwax — May 14, 2007 @ 6:25 pm

  7. I feel graced to have happened upon this blog. As a Roman Catholic convert, I was moved by the Holy Spirit to add my ‘2cents’. When I became aware that I was receiving a call home to Rome, I felt as though I would bring alot to the RCC. That is funny to look back on now, the longer I am a RC the more humble I become and allow the Spirit to teach me. I was reflecting back on my childhood teachings in the past couple of weeks. IE The Catholic Church is evil, and many more blanks that I am sure any Protestant can fill in. When a still small voice said to me, “Do you really think that after Jesus died for our sins, that God would leave man without a Church for 1500 years until Martin Luther could come along and save him.” So it dawned on me that if that were the case, Jesus would not have been our savior, Martin Luther would have been, and we all know that Jesus is the only Son of God. So the Church of the upper room. Peter upon this rock will I build my Church, is the Catholic Church handed down directly from Jesus or Jesus mistated what his intentions were. However Martin Luther did have a major role in the Cathoic Church, he brought to the attention of the world the errors by some of the men in power. If he had stopped there he would have been a doctor of the Church, he did not. In the years since, many have forgotten that the Doctrine of the Church did not offend Martin Luther, but the abuse of those men did cause him to find an ‘out’ for his own failures to be able to live under that doctine. Most important is the point that God did not leave us alone for 1500 years, he did however put us back on course, in action only, no doctrine was questioned or changed only the misquided actions were corrected. Peace be with you.

    Comment by Ken Hopping — May 14, 2007 @ 8:16 pm

  8. Trevin, Thanks for posting this. As someone who grew up catholic and has since settled in the Methodist Church I am looking forward to reading this dialog. I really like the tone you set.

    Comment by Nate Custer — May 26, 2007 @ 2:53 am

  9. [...] Conversations with a Catholic Part 1: Which Church [...]

    Pingback by Boudreaux’s Blurbs » Conversations With A Catholic — June 4, 2007 @ 9:41 am

  10. [...] Posts in this series: Conversations with a Catholic 1: The Church Conversations with a Catholic 2: Tradition Conversations with a Catholic 3: Glasses Conversations [...]

    Pingback by Conversations with a Catholic 6 - Common Ground on Liturgy « Kingdom People — September 7, 2007 @ 2:18 pm

  11. [...] Conversations with a Catholic 1: The Church Conversations with a Catholic 2: Tradition Conversations with a Catholic 3: Glasses Conversations with a Catholic 4: Interpreting Scripture  [...]

    Pingback by Conversations with a Catholic 5: Liturgy « Kingdom People — September 7, 2007 @ 2:19 pm

  12. [...] Conversations with a Catholic 1: The Church Conversations with a Catholic 2: Tradition Conversations with a Catholic 3: Glasses [...]

    Pingback by Conversations with a Catholic 4: Interpreting Scripture « Kingdom People — September 7, 2007 @ 2:20 pm

  13. [...] a Roman Catholic regarding the differences between our theological traditions. See previous posts here and [...]

    Pingback by Conversations with a Catholic 3: Glasses « Kingdom People — September 7, 2007 @ 2:21 pm

  14. [...] Conversations with a Catholic 2: Tradition My dialogue with Brian, a Roman Catholic, continues. See previous discussion here:  [...]

    Pingback by Conversations with a Catholic 2: Tradition « Kingdom People — September 7, 2007 @ 2:21 pm

  15. Trevin,
    I was googling for a friend’s blog and came across this post and saw a few words that caught my eye in the search results that drew me to this post.

    I very much appreciated Brian’s succinct response. Growing Pentecostal (a very dispensational/charismatic/fundamentalist brand of pentecostalism), I assumed Catholics were in dire need of salvation. I assumed that they were arrogant and proud, if only at a subconscious level, for assuming their ‘birthright’ so to speak, entitled them to salvation.

    But over time, particularly the past six years (starting in seminary) I have become aware that the pride was in me. Like Brian pointed out, as one reads the church fathers, it is very difficult to remain evangelical. Ultimately I realized the pride was my own, for I was arrogant enough to believe that 1500 years of almost unified church history (keeping in mind the great schism) was wrong, and that I knew better in and of myself to interpret scripture.

    Anyway, I set out to be an Assemblies of God missionary and now find myself embracing the Catholic church, which to be honest, while in response to study and my conscience, is scary as all get out.
    Peace!

    Comment by nate — September 28, 2008 @ 8:24 am

  16. [...] Articles: Conversations with a Catholic Justification – the Defining Doctrine of the [...]

    Pingback by Is Roman Catholicism the True Church? « Kingdom People — March 11, 2009 @ 3:15 am


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Blog at WordPress.com.